Unifying the Udev Rules Packages - My final post on this matter

TheOldFellow theoldfellow at gmail.com
Wed May 24 00:28:49 PDT 2006


Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> Jim Gifford wrote:
>> The bottom line is if it's Alex or Dan, it needs it's own repo. With 
>> branches for LFS and CLFS, so if we make some changes, then Alex or 
>> Dan can merge the changes in.
>>
>> On similar note I talked to DJ about this also, a separate repo for 
>> bootscripts, with the same requirements will also need to be setup.
> 
> I've never quite understood why BLFS and LFS kept their bootscripts 
> separate. They could all be in one package with one Makefile that could 
> handle every target.
> 

I'm all in favour of getting bootscripts out of the books.  Then those 
of us with the sense to dump sysvinit don't have to keep pruning the 
alfs scripts :-)  Same goes with Udev rules.

R.




More information about the lfs-dev mailing list