Unifying the Udev Rules Packages - My final post on this matter

TheOldFellow theoldfellow at gmail.com
Wed May 24 00:28:49 PDT 2006

Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> Jim Gifford wrote:
>> The bottom line is if it's Alex or Dan, it needs it's own repo. With 
>> branches for LFS and CLFS, so if we make some changes, then Alex or 
>> Dan can merge the changes in.
>> On similar note I talked to DJ about this also, a separate repo for 
>> bootscripts, with the same requirements will also need to be setup.
> I've never quite understood why BLFS and LFS kept their bootscripts 
> separate. They could all be in one package with one Makefile that could 
> handle every target.

I'm all in favour of getting bootscripts out of the books.  Then those 
of us with the sense to dump sysvinit don't have to keep pruning the 
alfs scripts :-)  Same goes with Udev rules.


More information about the lfs-dev mailing list