Minor build order breakage

Greg Schafer gschafer at zip.com.au
Thu Nov 30 12:45:35 PST 2006


Matthew Burgess wrote:

> Oh dear.  Sorry about that folks.  As Bruce points out though, Trac's 
> much better at remembering bugs than I am!

This "must-use-trac" attitude from the LFS project is abhorrent IMHO. Most
open source projects are just happy to receive any feedback whatsoever.
Whatever happened to the good ol days when Gerard or some responsible
person carefully recorded in the BTS issues reported on the mailing list?

> I think the easiest solution here is to move sed up above e2fsprogs in 
> the build order.  As Dan mentioned, sed's dependencies are already met 
> at that point.  Dan, Coreutils has a dependency on `chattr' from 
> e2fsprogs (see tests/tail-2/append-only).  I don't think adding a 
> /bin/rm symlink will help with that, will it?

The /bin/rm issue is only indirectly related. After the moving of
e2fsprogs, just look at the e2fsprogs testsuite build log and you'll see
why the /bin/rm symlink is needed.

Regards
Greg
-- 
http://www.diy-linux.org/




More information about the lfs-dev mailing list