kdebase vs. linux headers
bryan at kadzban.is-a-geek.net
Thu Oct 5 15:51:44 PDT 2006
Ken Moffat wrote:
> I suppose "correct" comes down to finding out why asm-i386/types.h
> has this two-part condition in the first place.
I've seen some remarks in the gcc list archives about "long long" and
> Does 'long long' conflict with ISO C++? Yes, if no diagnostics is
Now, I just did some testing with "long long" and g++ (4.1.1) to see how
it handled it. It seems to accept it just fine unless you add -pedantic
(then it errors, saying "long long is not supported in ISO C++"). So it
looks like the kernel check isn't required (at least for gcc/g++).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 258 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the lfs-dev