LFS-Stable-6.2: duplicate udev rule file number (minor issue?)...

Dan Nicholson dbn.lists at gmail.com
Thu Oct 26 09:14:41 PDT 2006

On 10/26/06, Kris van Rens <krisvanrens.list at gmail.com> wrote:
> Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> > This is a non-issue. Both are processed, and in this particular case it
> > doesn't matter which of the files is examined first.
> Ah ok, no problem then.
> It would be 'cleaner' to give it another number IMHO.
> OT: Why 26 anyway? What's the thought behind this? (I'm curious)

Yes, it was a fine explanation of lexical ordering, but I don't think
that's really what you were after. The important thing is that these
rules are processed after the main rules file, 25-lfs.rules, but
before anything else.


More information about the lfs-dev mailing list