Greetings and a General Cleanup

Alexander E. Patrakov patrakov at
Mon Oct 30 20:32:42 PST 2006 wrote:
> I still would see something working on the alfs server-client binary code, but 
> looks like there is no progremmers interested on (or maybe the lack of 
> interest is due how jhalfs has been improved).

Indeed, jhalfs is just a very good tool. I have a plan of building a new 
MiniCD with it, by patching the minimum of additional packages into the 
LFS book and running the jhalfs script on that patched book. Is this OK 
for jhalfs maintainers?

Alexander E. Patrakov

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list