Slow but finally just about done

Matthew Burgess matthew at
Tue Oct 31 10:36:57 PST 2006

Gerard Beekmans wrote:

> The last few weeks have been beyond hectic which also caused added 
> delays. I was approached by a company and to make a long story short, I 
> accepted employment with them.


> I don't think it's a great idea to deploy the server and then 
> immediately leave the country for a few weeks in case the deployment is 
> not as smooth as we all hope it to be.


  > The added benefit of the new job is that I will be in a place where I
> can be involved with, and work on LFS during normal business hours at 
> least a couple days a week.

Great news!  Whilst I don't pay your wage, if I could request that some 
of that early LFS work involve documenting the setup of the new server 
whilst it's still fresh in your mind, that'd be really useful to 
distribute the administrative burden amongst several folks.

> I plan to use the opportunity to get LFS out of maintenance mode and 
> back as a forward moving project the way we all want it to be, and it 
> used to be.

I look forward to hearing your ideas on what "forward moving" means for 
LFS.  Whilst the LFS book has been pretty much just ticking along, 
keeping abreast of upstream changes fairly reliably, the other projects 
appear to be moving forward nicely.  ALFS, in the form of jhalfs, has 
been moving at an incredible rate (so much so, I have finally ditched my 
own home-brewed scripts - this is the first tool that I've felt 
comfortable enough with to do that!).  CLFS has had its first official 
release and BLFS is about to get 6.2 out the door.  I know I've grossly 
simplified the current state of affairs - I'll let the other project 
leads expand, if they so wish.



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list