State of Things [was: Re: Gnome-Python]

[Jeremy Huntwork]

On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 08:21:14PM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> has ever been. Too bad half the folks that would want to use it
> won't because they feel that their 64 bit machines need CLFS
> massaging.

Where do you get this information from?

I think that most people that use a 64-bit platform realize that except
for the occasional missing patch, BLFS works just fine on 64-bit
machines. It does just what it is meant to do, provide a reference for
the tweaks and custom programs you want for your LFS machine.

I don't think as many people are turned off by BLFS as you might think,
but then again, that is just a personal opinion. I have no real data to
back that up. I do know that even recently there have been people asking
for support when trying to build LFS on 64-bit machines, even though
they were fully aware of the existence of CLFS.

--
JH