Resolution (was Re: jh-branch)

[Jeremy Huntwork]

Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> Yes, I think this is good enough for now for the DIY reference build, if 
> it is clearly stated that the patch is a workaround. Not sure about LFS 
> - the x86 build is not affected, the x86_64 branch apparently (Jeremy: 
> am I right?) should not be used (because it is merged into jh), and the 
> jh branch solved the problem by upgrading binutils.

Yes, you are correct.

--
JH