An idea for a new development model

[david567]

Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 08/15/07 07:20 CST:
>
>   
>> I would love to see some sort of proper support for PM go into LFS, but 
>> that all depends on the community...
>>     
>
> I'll go on record as -1.
>
> I feel we should mention it, provide links to the various alternatives,
> and drive on. We are not a distribution. We are a book that shows how
> to compile Linux from scratch. Let's don't forget that.
>   
No, lets not forget that.  However, showing an implementation of package 
management is not in any way detrimental to the education of readers.
> Package management is beyond the scope of showing how to compile
> packages (and which packages to compile).
>
>   
I'm not convinced one way or the other.  PM is not what makes linux 
tick, but it may help keep it ticking.

---
David Jensen