An idea for a new development model

[david567]

Randy McMurchy wrote:
> I can't see it happening in BLFS for the simple reason that it would
> be a monumental task (automating the proper inserts could perhaps be
> done, but we wouldn't do that until *every* package has been tested,
> which again would be monumental).
>
>   
The 'BLFS' task is already 'monumental'.  Let's see what ideas 'emerge' 
(can say that here?), there's some 'smarts' being devoted to this thread!

---
David Jensen