An idea for a new development model

[Jeremy Huntwork]

On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 11:59:34AM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> I can't see it happening in BLFS for the simple reason that it would
> be a monumental task (automating the proper inserts could perhaps be
> done, but we wouldn't do that until *every* package has been tested,
> which again would be monumental).

By the same token, once you get past the initial work of adding the PM
framework to BLFS, it might make developing and testing BLFS a whole lot
easier, simply because of the nature of package managment. But, you're
more qualified to speak on whether that's the case than I am.

--
JH