proposal for inclusion of e2fsprogs in chapter 5
bruce.dubbs at gmail.com
Mon Dec 10 20:34:09 PST 2007
Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> Thomas Pegg wrote:
>> From what I remember it was so we could mount /dev/pts and /dev/shm
>> inside of the chroot, but that's unnecessary now with the bind mount
>> of the host's /dev.
> The bind-mount of /dev isn't what makes it unnecessary. That's why
> section 6.2.3 still exists -- we still have to mount devpts separately.
> And we use the newly-built mount for this since it exists in /tools/bin,
> and /tools/bin is at the start of $PATH. (Or at least, I think it
> should still be first.)
> What I don't know is whether we could get away with using the host's
> mount binary instead, if we didn't do util-linux...
What I was thinking of is that we could do a final and only build of
util-linux and e2fsprogs as the first packages of Chapter 6. That way
we could drop in util-linux-ng without any other changes. It avoids
building util-linux (and if we go to util-linux-ng, e2fsprogs) in Chapter 5.
I don't know if this really makes sense or not. It may just be some
minor optimization in the package order. I'm not advocating anything
here, but just discussing options.
More information about the lfs-dev