[Fwd: Re: [LFS Trac] #2111: Adding PACO to LFS]
Alan Lord
alanslists at gmail.com
Sun Dec 2 13:08:18 MST 2007
Can I just throw in my opinion on this subject?
I read the ticket and this subject in general has come up on many
occasions before...
As a long time user of LFS/BLFS I would really LOVE to have a
"management" tool for my systems that allowed me to update/upgrade and,
probably most importantly, remove components in an organised and "safe" way.
But I do not believe this should be an integral part of LFS, and
probably not BLFS either. It is a subject that warrants - in my opinion
- another book/project in the LFS family.
If it was developed to offer the kind of system management tools that
many of us want to have, the main books (LFS/BLFS) might need changing
to support it, or might not, and if the "books" are followed *to the
letter* then the LFS Manager could be dropped even after your system is
built (Obviously I can see some circumstances where this could fail
spectacularly, but guidance in the main books should make it clear how
to build to support the management tools or what to watch for if you
decide to deviate...)
Could this be a way to stimulate some more life here? Develop a new book
for the LFS family that provides system management tools. I'm sure PACA
is a fine tool (not used it but not heard much ever said in a bad light
about it) and maybe that becomes the foundation for such a book? Or
something else... At least it would get some dialogue and some activity
on here. A few blog comments and articles around the net might bring in
some new blood with good ideas too.
It may be that by trying to get the LFS and BLFS systems into such a
position that a management tool could be dropped in before, during or
after a build, that the books' structure becomes a better platform to
develop the jhalfs type tools too... So perhaps some sort of
architecture description and requirements specifications are needed
first and then see what needs to be changed with what we have to suit
what we need going forward.
Sorry if this is noise or way off the mark...
Alan
--
The way out is open!
http://www.theopensourcerer.com
More information about the lfs-dev
mailing list