Dev book images are missing

Dan Nicholson dbn.lists at gmail.com
Fri Feb 9 10:50:11 PST 2007


On 2/9/07, M.Canales.es <macana at macana-es.com> wrote:
>
> Having the images in SVN have this pros, IMHO:
>
>   - Make the sources more auto-contained
>   - Avoid setting a Makefile envars and updating the XSL version number in
>     stylesheets/pdf/lfs-admon.xsl.
>   - Also allow to use customized images, if dessired, and prevent to use newer
>     upstream ones that might not have a good look for our book layout.

I would add "having version control" to that list. Having the images
in svn allows us to track the history of the images instead of being
tied to some external thing.

--
Dan



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list