Dev book images are missing

Randy McMurchy randy at
Fri Feb 9 11:13:22 PST 2007

Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 02/09/07 12:50 CST:

> I would add "having version control" to that list. Having the images
> in svn allows us to track the history of the images instead of being
> tied to some external thing.

The "version control" of the images is already taken care of in the
XSL Stylesheets package. We don't need to do it as well. :-)

Either way, I think BLFS and LFS should use similar strategies. I
like the LFS way. :-)


rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.26] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3]
[GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux i686]
13:09:01 up 30 days, 13:23, 1 user, load average: 0.19, 0.10, 0.06

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list