Dev book images are missing

Bruce Dubbs bruce.dubbs at
Fri Feb 9 11:24:59 PST 2007

Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 02/09/07 12:50 CST:
>> I would add "having version control" to that list. Having the images
>> in svn allows us to track the history of the images instead of being
>> tied to some external thing.
> The "version control" of the images is already taken care of in the
> XSL Stylesheets package. We don't need to do it as well. :-)

But the version control is WRT the XSL Stylesheets package, not the
LFS/BLFS books.  If they changed the images to be twice as big (or twice
 as small), I don't think we would want those to *automatically* go into
the books.

  -- Bruce

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list