Incremental upgrades

Ken Moffat ken at
Tue Jul 17 17:14:52 PDT 2007

On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 05:48:15PM -0600, Gerard Beekmans wrote:
> A minor Glibc version upgrade can typically be done a lot easier. Often
> there aren't any problems as far as I can remember.
 No doubt if I keep casting aspersions on the likely appearance of
2.5.1 I'll aggravate one of the developers sufficiently and it will
be released (meanwhile, I note that 2.6.1 is still not out, despite
the malloc debug issue Greg pointed to in
) so please forgive my scepticism that glibc will ever issue minor
version upgrades again.

 More to the point, I've long thought that we don't really cover
"the long-term care of your LFS system" (e.g. I don't think we point
out that people need to monitor security lists).  I periodically see
mails from people who built LFS in a single partition using all of
their disk - maybe we should admit that long term you should be
rebuilding your LFS to get to a new version, and therefore you might
want to consider your partitioning (e.g. perhaps put /home on a
separate partition as well as leaving space for the next build) ?

 OTOH, I think I can remember a large effort to prevent the book
being dumbed-down, so maybe this is something that should be obvious
to builders who intend to stay with LFS.

das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce

More information about the lfs-dev mailing list