Plans for LFS-6.3

Dan Nicholson dbn.lists at gmail.com
Sun Jul 22 11:15:31 PDT 2007


On 7/22/07, M.Canales.es <macana at macana-es.com> wrote:
> El Jueves, 19 de Julio de 2007 00:13, Matthew Burgess escribió:
>
> > I did a full final system testsuite run with the latest package updates
> > (including a repackaged version of the latest iproute2 package).  No
> > failures there.  I've not done an ICA/farce build though, so that would
> > certainly be useful.
>
> ICA/farce reports that the next files differ on iteration1Viteration2 but not
> in iteration2Viteration3:
>
> /etc/ld.so.cache
> /usr/include/c++/4.1.2/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bits/stdc++.h.gch/0{0,2}g.gch
> /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/cc1
> /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.2/cc1plus
>
> The cc1{,plus} differ was reported some time ago, but the issue was not
> resoled:
>
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2007-February/059028.html

Yeah, those look normal. I think you can get the cc1 and cc1plus
differences to go away if you strip at build time. I.e., `make
LDFLAGS=-s'.

> Glibc testsuite sow this errors in iteration1:
>
> posix/tst-vfork3.out
> nptl/tst-cancell.out
>
> but iteration{2,3} show only:
>
> nptl/tst-cancell.out

I don't know about tst-vfork3, but tst-cancel1 will fail on gcc-4.1.

http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2007-July/059606.html

Do you still have the output from tst-vfork3?

Thanks, Manuel.

--
Dan



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list