Inconsistent use of && in BOOK

[Dan Nicholson]

I was going to edit something on the ncurses page the other day and
noticed some && in chained commands. It seems that usual way in LFS is
not to do this. Compare the linker script section of ncurses to the
localedef commands in glibc.

http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/chapter06/ncurses.html
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/chapter06/glibc.html

Assuming they're unwanted, I grepped through for '&&' and
found quite a few. Attached is a patch to remove the offenders, but I
thought I'd post here first before committing.

--
Dan
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: no-double-ampersand.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 9859 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/attachments/20070724/5b245b0e/attachment.bin