time for syslog-ng? (was Re: klogd)

[Greg Schafer]

Greg Schafer wrote:

> Indeed, but IMHO some of the Fedora rationale is questionable ie: "dead
> upstream" is not quite true. That is, if you can believe the sysklogd
> maintainer :-)
> 
> http://lists.infodrom.org/infodrom-sysklogd/2007/0011.html

A new release has been made after 6 years. Shock!

sysklogd-1.5 is up on the download site. No release announcement yet that
I could see.

Regards
Greg
-- 
http://www.diy-linux.org/