Wrong cpu nodes for cpuid driver
bryan at kadzban.is-a-geek.net
Tue Jun 12 16:07:17 PDT 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> Oh, wow. I just found this upstream version of devices.txt.
> Someone should go through our rules and see if there are any
It'll take a bit, but I'll start on it. (Actually I'll start at the end
and work backwards, in case anybody else is starting at the beginning.)
For reference, to see your devices in a format that can be compared to
the list fairly easily, you can:
ls -l /dev | grep ^[bc] | sort -s -k 5,5n -k 1.1,1.1 -k 6,6n
but of course that doesn't show devices in subdirectories of /dev, and
it only shows devices that your system supports.
> I notice this:
> The prefix /dev/sr (instead of /dev/scd) has been deprecated.
Yeah, we should probably fix that one, at least. OTOH, if the user uses
persistent names, they won't need to use sr* or scd*. Oh well, it
should still be corrected.
> I also noticed that most of my devices in /dev/pts have the tape
> group instead of tty. Anyone else notice this?
Mine all have my user's primary GID. That's odd.
OTOH, /dev/pts isn't handled by udev either, it's handled by the devpts
filesystem. According to the grantpt(3) manpage, the GID of the slave
device isn't specified in any standard; it may just be that your devpts
decides to use the tape group for some crazy reason.
tape isn't your user's primary GID, is it?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the lfs-dev