time for syslog-ng? (was Re: klogd)

Justin R. Knierim lfs at lfs-matrix.net
Tue May 22 22:03:05 PDT 2007

Robert Connolly wrote:
> Syslog-ng was in the LFS book for a short time. It's terrible under load, 
> servers can't use it.
I haven't had problems with either packages myself, syslog-ng was
perfectly fine on my dedicateds.  Actually at work, we have 2000 shared
hosting servers hosting 500,000 domains running debian sarge, all of
them run syslog-ng with no problems at all.  Of course there could be
something I don't know about where syslog-ng lacks.


More information about the lfs-dev mailing list