time for syslog-ng? (was Re: klogd)
bruce.dubbs at gmail.com
Tue May 22 22:10:47 PDT 2007
Justin R. Knierim wrote:
> Robert Connolly wrote:
>> Syslog-ng was in the LFS book for a short time. It's terrible under load,
>> servers can't use it.
> I haven't had problems with either packages myself, syslog-ng was
> perfectly fine on my dedicateds. Actually at work, we have 2000 shared
> hosting servers hosting 500,000 domains running debian sarge, all of
> them run syslog-ng with no problems at all. Of course there could be
> something I don't know about where syslog-ng lacks.
Just to add to this, anduin has been running with syslog-ng from the
beginning and it has never had a problem.
More information about the lfs-dev