ICA diff in cc1 and cc1plus

[Greg Schafer]

(dredging up an old thread)

Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 3/19/07, Dan Nicholson <dbn.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> So, it seems this difference is embedded in cc1 and can't be stripped
>> out after the build. I'm assuming that the original difference is just
>> debugging symbols like would normally be the case. I'll try to narrow
>> that down further, but this may be a false positive ICA regression.
> 
> I took a look at the diff of the `objdump -s' output from the
> unstripped cc1-dummy in each iteration. All the differences were in
> the .debug sections, so I think I can say that the difference in cc1
> and cc1plus can be ignored as a result of the embedded checksum. I
> still don't know why this isn't the case in DIY.

It's because I build GCC like this:

make LDFLAGS=$LDFLAGS

with LDFLAGS="-s"

I just hit this diff when ICA-verifying the new build method I'm working
on where I'd ripped out the LDFLAGS. Back in they go...

Regards
Greg
-- 
http://www.diy-linux.org/