mktemp, tempfile & coreutils
dbn.lists at gmail.com
Thu Oct 18 07:49:06 PDT 2007
On 10/18/07, Matthew Burgess <matthew at linuxfromscratch.org> wrote:
> Everyone seems to agree that this is the way forward. So, how about we just remove the current mktemp patch, rather than wait for coreutils to make a release containing their implementation? This could give us a little more time to root out any scripts that still call `tempfile', though from Bryan & Bruce's investigations, there don't appear to be too many.
Sounds good. I imagine things will be fine. And if they're not, we'll
just fix them to DTRT (call mktemp).
More information about the lfs-dev