sysadm.taipan67 at btinternet.com
Fri Oct 19 11:11:39 PDT 2007
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
>> Note, however, that this is not the same type of module as "insmod" and
>> "lsmod" Grub2 commands refer to. Grub2 has its own modules for loading
>> Linux kernels, loading FreeBSD kernels, support for filesystems, and so
>> on. Obviously, not all of them are used in the typical "boot a kernel
>> from ext3 partition" scenario - but this is not a valid reason to call
>> Grub2 bloated, since the old Grub1 has all this functionality always
>> built statically into stage2.
> Overloading the meaning of lsmod and rmmod does not seem to me to be a
> good idea. I would think something like lsgmod (ls grub module) or even
> lsext (ls extention) would be better. Using the same term for different
> things is a recipe for confusing users.
> -- Bruce
Well, if you consider that when installing & configuring grub1 you are
currently obliged to use the term 'root' in *five* different contexts,
they're actually getting better... ;)
I know this is no help to the discussion, it's just a pet peeve that i
felt compelled to air.
More information about the lfs-dev