[Clfs-dev] r7105
M.Canales.es
macana at macana-es.com
Mon Sep 10 11:42:54 MDT 2007
El Lunes, 10 de Septiembre de 2007 19:26, Dan Nicholson escribió:
> That would be the drawback to this approach. If we do go back to using
> the host's stylesheets, then it should be completely clear in the
> sources (or somewhere else) what version is expected. Possibly we can
> check and enforce this in the Makefile.
The expected version is defined on the xsl:import statements placed on the top
level stylesheets/ files (see the LFS-6.2 stylesheets for an example), and a
sane system must not remap an explicit DB-XSL version to a different one via
XML catalogs (that is fine for compatible DTDs releases, but never for XSL
versions), thus that should not be an issue.
--
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org
LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.info
TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org
More information about the lfs-dev
mailing list