[Clfs-dev] r7105
Alexander E. Patrakov
patrakov at ums.usu.ru
Tue Sep 11 07:48:24 MDT 2007
M.Canales.es wrote:
> El Martes, 11 de Septiembre de 2007 15:04, Alexander E. Patrakov escribió:
>
>
>> OK. Now imagine the following situation: someone wants to create a
>> Debian package with the LFS book. Debian policy requires that all HTML
>> and PDF files are rebuilt from XML source in this case. If the LFS book
>> relies on the external DocBook XSL setup of a certain version, I see no
>> way to do it, except by reverting the switch to the external copy of
>> DocBook XSL stylesheets (which is as bad as any other reversion of
>> upstream changes) or changing the stylesheet version to "current" (which
>> is going to break PDF - even worse).
>>
>
>
> I don't see here an issue for us, but for distro packages creators.
>
Yes, an issue for distro package creators, but caused by LFS upstream
not willing to cooperate :)
> In any distro, when package A depend on version X of package B where X is not
> the default version for B on the target distro release version, then a
> package B-X that can be installed side-by-side without conflicts with the
> default package B is created.
>
Yes, if such package is available.
> That has been true from always for autotools packages, back-ward compatibility
> libraries, libstdc++ versions needed to run closed binaries, etc.
>
> Why should it be diferent when related about DB-XSL versions?
>
>
This is a question to distros, not to me. Anyway, there are no Debian
packages with old docbook-xsl versions.
--
Alexander E. Patrakov
More information about the lfs-dev
mailing list