GCC-4.3.1, Linux-2.6.26.2

[TheOldFellow]

On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:53:52 -0500
Randy McMurchy <randy at linuxfromscratch.org> wrote:

> TheOldFellow wrote:
> > With the few suggestions from Greg, this looks quite good enough for
> > SVN, and moves everything well forward.
> 
> I'd like to see us also use a snapshot of Glibc-2.8
> in this updated build as well. It appears there will
> be no more tarballs coming from the Glibc devs. As
> far as Ulrich is concerned anyway. Roland may still
> roll a tarball, but we can't count on it.
> 
> I'm building right now with glibc-2.8-20080825.
> 

Good call.  If we are going to get LFS back into development we need to
stay at the leading (preferably not bleeding) edge of the tool-chain.

If only there was a serious alternative to glibc.  However, we used to
use snapshots, we can again.  It just takes a little more QA.

R.