Future LFS 7.x Plans

[Jeremy Huntwork]

Jim Gifford wrote:
> It seems now that LFS is ready to go into the world that CLFS has been 
> in for a while. There seems to be a lot of discussions, that are going 
> to be a duplication of work, and no one from LFS reaching out to the 
> CLFS team for input on what issues we have seen and what you will cross. 

Thinking on this some, and reading through old posts, I came across this 
one from Craig Jackson: 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2007-July/059585.html

I think Craig made some valid points which are still valid now, perhaps 
even more so, given that man-power/activity in LFS and all its related 
projects is low these days. It's picking up somewhat, but it's still 
low. From a brief conversation with Joe Ciccone not too long ago, I 
gather CLFS is in a similar boat.

Can we resolve any actual differences between the projects (and 
individuals making up the projects) and put aside any perceived disputes 
and work together in a more unified manner again? If so, what are we 
willing to do to be more unified? What possibilities are there?

--
JH