glibc @BASH@ thing

[Gilles Espinasse]

Selon Mateusz Grotek <unoduetre at poczta.onet.pl>:

> Yes. I understand that. So i'm trying to send this patch to libc-alpha
> too. I donno if glibc utilities would work with dash (without bash
> installed). But if it is possible, we could give users choice which
> shell they like. People from ubuntu made dash default shell, so why we
> couldn't do it? Is it fair to force users to have bash installed? With
> BLFS it could be, because many packages depend on it in their scripts.
> But LFS should be more basic i suppose. you don't have to build any
> package from BLFS if you don't want to. But you MUST to build all
> packages from LFS if you want your system. So let's give the users
> choice. I donno if other packages from LFS depends on bash installed. If
> there are some, this issue doesn't matter. Do you know if there are any?
> --
glibc developper could be not so open
for example
http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2008-05/msg00058.html

Gilles