Changes in the LFS build procedure
Bruce Dubbs
bruce.dubbs at gmail.com
Tue Jun 3 22:26:02 MDT 2008
Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> What this means is that the process to update bootscripts is now to change
>> the appropriate file in BOOK/bootscripts and update the entity in
>> packages.ent
>> <!ENTITY lfs-bootscripts-version "20080522">
>> To have the current date.
>> Likewise, for udev-config, update the files in BOOK/udev-config and the
>> entity
>> <!ENTITY udev-config "udev-config-20080522">
> For consistency, shouldn't the above also just be '20080522' ?
I didn't know how many places each entity was used so I didn't change it. It's
really kinda esoteric though. The only ones that need to change this are
editors and it's really pretty obvious what should be changed.
> Also, if we're generating these tarballs automagically now, perhaps they
> don't even need a version entity? Just use the same version as the book which
> would be, for example, 'SVN-20080522'.
The problem is that the book changes a lot more frequently than the boot scripts
or udev config files. I really don't think that it is a good idea to roll the
scripts often. They should reflect the contents of the tarballs, not the date
of the latest svn.
-- Bruce
More information about the lfs-dev
mailing list