Poll about package management

[Bruce Dubbs]

TheOldFellow wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 08:30:50 +1100
> Greg Schafer <gschafer at zip.com.au> wrote:
> <snip> Having said that, I believe
>> PM should be a personal thing, which is why I would never advise anyone
>> "you must XYZ as your PM". ie: I would never select a default PM for LFS.
> 
> On the other hand, being of the educative-objective brigade, there's no
> harm in showing a fully worked example.  That's how I always view
> SysVinit and the bootscripts in LFS.  Maybe using Pacman as the example
> would be better that RPM, given many people's (inexplicable, IMO)
> antipathy to RedHat.

Excellent point.  This has caused me to change my mind about including
PM in the book.  However, I'll probably not use it myself.

  -- Bruce