Improper handling of -p ${pidfile} in lfs-bootscripts

[DJ Lucas]

DJ Lucas wrote:

> 
> However, it seems to me that if LFS hasn't released say every (insert a 
> responsible value here - 6?) months, if there is errata, a new tiny 
> release should be made.  It's not like it takes all that much to modify 
> a released book from it's own svn branch--I mean all the hard work is 
> done already.  Proofreading, testing, instruction verification, test 
> suite results, SBU timings, etc. should still be good.

Open mouth, insert foot...  That was a totally ignorant response on my 
part.  My apologies to Bruce, Matt, and all previous release managers 
and support staff.  Yet again, I've spoken before thinking.  What I 
should have said is "From an editor's POV, it's almost done."  I have 
absolutely no idea how much work goes into updating the website, writing 
a release announcement, setting up source and patch directories, 
subversion tags, mirroring, and all the other fine details that I'm sure 
I've missed.  I suspect it is difficult (to say the least) to get all of 
that work done and not miss anything.  Just the number of tasks 
alone...jeez.   Again, I am very sorry for my short sighted response, 
and very much appreciate the hard work from our release 
managers/coordinators.

-- DJ Lucas