About the future format for LFS (reworded)
bruce.dubbs at gmail.com
Mon Sep 1 10:09:44 PDT 2008
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> the biggest
> barrier I think we have, is the fact that xmllint and xsltproc couldn't
> handle RNG documents correctly.
To me this is a show stopper. We need those or the equivalent programs to
generate the book in its various forms, wget-list, etc.
> After spending all this effort, just to get us to the same state as we're in
> currently (i.e. can validate and render the book sources), what, definitively
> do we gain?
I asked this question yesterday too. Until that is answered satisfactorily, I
don't think the current build method will be changed. As of right now, I just
don't see any significant benefit, but a lot of effort.
More information about the lfs-dev