Adapting LFS SVN for multilib

[Greg Schafer]

Jeremy Huntwork wrote:

> As far as 'butchering the source' goes, there's nothing done in the 
> first pass of GCC to the source that isn't done in pass 2. Essentially 
> it's the same sort of stuff we've _always_ done in pass 2 to ensure that 
> the compiler uses only the libs and headers in /tools. In fact, it's 
> less, because we don't have to mess with a specs setting.

Sorry, you're wrong and clearly not getting it. Meanwhile, it's apparent
you've turned into a Ryan nut hugger, just like the rest of the CLFS
crowd. God help LFS!

I honestly don't care anymore. LFS is a project without direction, without
leadership and apparently has lost sight of what made it popular back in
the day. Good luck fellas!

Regards
Greg
-- 
http://www.diy-linux.org/