Adapting LFS SVN for multilib

[Ryan Oliver]

Ryan Oliver wrote:
>
> Very quick patch attached.
>
> Patch is there for you to have a play around with as a starting point...
>
> (for upstream they may want lib_str to be
> #define static const char lib_str[]  { DIR_SEPARATOR, "lib", 
> DIR_SEPARATOR, 0 }
> somewhere at the top of gcc.c, possibly with "lib" replaced by a macro.
> This dispenses with the xmalloc, concat and free.
> Also they may not like the way I have done the strcmp, but hey, we 
> aren't altering the contents of value...)
>
> Getting anything accepted upstream generally has more chance when you 
> have more than one person making the request...
> If there isn't really an accepted need more voices can generally push 
> it up the priority level...
>
> If you come up with something better and want to push it upstream (you 
> have more chance as the original requester), I'll happily add my voice 
> to the list.
>  

Gah, I should know better than to think that anything I send home from 
lotus notes will come out sanely...

This time with readable patch attached
[R]


-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: gcc-4.3.2-add_multilib_b_option-1.patch
Url: http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/attachments/20090115/a5819620/attachment.ksh