LFS Toolchain

[Greg Schafer]

Jeremy Huntwork wrote:

> No, sorry, I don't. In the comments of that bug report the dev suggests 
> using sysroot for pass 1 of gcc.

Yeah, and he also says create $sysroot/usr/include. If you're going to
hang your hat on the word of 1 junior GCC dev...

> Also, haven't you noticed that making use of sysroot in pass one 
> eliminates the scenario that is causing you trouble in pass 2, thereby 
> removing the need for the patch?

Huh? Not at all. Please, JH, explain how this is so.

And like I said earlier, the patch is already gone in my dev build - no
sysroot in sight.

Regards
Greg
-- 
http://www.diy-linux.org/