GCC 4.4.0 XCFLAGS

[Guy Dalziel]

On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 06:52:49AM -0700, Bryan Kadzban wrote:
> The point of adding that flag was to create byte-for-byte identical
> compiler binaries.  Have you verified that hacking on T_CFLAGS (instead
> of XCFLAGS) actually does this?

Frankly after around the 10th compile of gcc just to check whether every
single byte was perfect I grew quite tired. At the end of the day the
fix I provided will compile gcc with -fomit-frame-pointer, if anyone has
an issue with it they're quite welcome to figure out another way to do
it.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/attachments/20090704/a3aaa77d/attachment.bin