gawk-3.1.7

[DJ Lucas]

Matthew Burgess wrote:
> I don't mind adding it to 6.5 though, if the general opinion is that it
> belongs in
> there.

I've no educated opinion on this, so I'll offer a question to qualify it. 
How likely is it that, or how many other,  undiscovered packages would
have the same problem?

-- DJ Lucas



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content, and is believed to be clean.