glibc make -k in lfs-dev chapter 6
bryan at kadzban.is-a-geek.net
Thu Jun 11 09:10:24 PDT 2009
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Bryan Kadzban wrote:
>> Bryan Kadzban wrote:
>>> Poking around in glibc, this *looks* like a bug in it (at least in
>> Filed this bug:
>> Does the patch mentioned there (to glibc) fix the testsuite? It needs
>> to be done whether it fixes the tests or not, though (for 32-bit
> Wow. That's really crawling around the innards Bryan.
Heh. And I don't even know for sure if this was the issue causing the
testsuite failures. :-P
It does really look like a bug, though.
(Re: "crawling around the innards": That's what happens when my most
recent coding was trying to get signalfd to work on a really old glibc
but a fairly new kernel. :-) )
> My observation to their responsiveness to outside bugs is that they will
> probably ignore it. Let's hope I'm wrong.
Somebody from SuSE seems to have commented. *crossing fingers*...
It seems fairly obvious from comparing 32-bit and 64-bit glibc what's wrong
with the constants being used, as long as someone actually does that.
(I'm just hoping it doesn't get closed as a duplicate of bug 333: "build
failures aren't to be reported here".)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the lfs-dev