Thinking forward LFS-7.0

Andrew Benton b3nton at gmail.com
Sun Mar 20 10:06:23 PDT 2011


On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 09:04:03 -0400
"+Jan" <jonathan.oksman at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Andrew Benton <b3nton at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> >
> > What would it take to compile a 64 bit system without the /lib
> > => /lib64 symlink (i.e, with the libs installed into /lib and
> > no /lib64)? Obviously, it works as it is, it just looks like an ugly
> > hack. I'd much rather (for aesthetic reasons) do away with
> > {/usr,}/lib64 if I could.
> >
> >
> I did this on my last build of LFS a few months ago before my laptop's
> charger decided to break down.  It requires a fair bit of attention to make
> sure your toolchain is built properly but once you get past GCC and Glibc
> then most LFS packages build nicely.

Any chance you could give me a clue how you got gcc to install
into /usr/lib and not /usr/lib64?

Andy



More information about the lfs-dev mailing list