[lfs-dev] Test failures in something close to current LFS
zarniwhoop at ntlworld.com
Fri Jan 30 14:59:17 PST 2015
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 12:23:56AM +0000, Ken Moffat wrote:
> gcc: 125 unexpected failures in g++, 658 in gcc, 22 in libstdc++
> instead of the usual handful of failures. The last time I saw those
> sorts of numbers was a little while before my AmigaOne expired.
I wonder if some of it was because my tmpfs for /tmp was too small.
I thought I was using 6GB, but I was on my 7.6 system when I set
that up, the November system I used to build the new one was still
using only 2GB for /tmp.
I've now rebuilt gcc on the completed system, again using only 2GB
for the tmpfs. This time, the results were a little better - only
83 unexpected failures in gcc, and 42 in g++, none in libstdc++.
In both cases, I used -j4.
Looking at the gcc errors, in the gcc3/ directory I see 65
unexpected failures starting in c11-atomic-3.c, at a line which
relates t pointer arithmetic. In the torture tests, in
limits-exprparen.c I see a segfault (ICE) on the first test of each
different optimization level, and they all fail - I think that is
normal for me.
I could not find any details for the g++ tests, and they were all
over the place.
Looking at my syslog, I see a series of segfaults -probably the
torture tests, perhaps a little more. At the end of the tests there
was still 500MB free in /tmp.
I've built over 300 regular packages on this system (I exclude Xorg
headers, docbook catalogues, fonts, perl modules becasue those do
not necessarily do any compilation. During my scripted builds I had
_one_ segfault (cups), but it was ok at the second attempt.
So, for the moment I'm just going to flag this up as "looks
serious, unexplained, but so far I do not see any problems in the
And for what it is worth, 6GB is not enough to build firefox in
/tmp - I had to drop down to 4GB to get enough space for the link,
as well as building on a disk (the build in 6GB was using over 5GB
plus whatever the link wanted).
Also, although some of the build has felt faster in /tmp -
particularly untarring and rm -rf the build directories, for the
actual build times I see almost-identical times. That matches
Bruce's reply to my original post.
Nanny Ogg usually went to bed early. After all, she was an old lady.
Sometimes she went to bed as early as 6 a.m.
More information about the lfs-dev