[lfs-dev] More on static libs

Fernando de Oliveira famobr at yahoo.com.br
Fri Mar 13 10:44:00 PDT 2015

On 13-03-2015 13:13, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>> But I would much prefer to disable as much as we could by configure or
>> makefile choices, only moving out the others, after compressing. Move,
>> then compress wouldn't work in an upgrade. Mus be compress, then move.
> I don't like compressing.  In my sandbox, the files in question only
> amount to 7.9M.  That's trivial.  Compressing would make it more
> difficult to restore the library if the user decides that it is needed.

My reason for compressing was that there is no chance that a "smart"
package finds it.


More information about the lfs-dev mailing list