Gcc Sig 11 Fails, Small Config Machine, WorkAround

Bill Maltby LFS Related lfsbill at wlmlx1.wlmcs.com
Wed Mar 13 17:34:55 PST 2002


Do you have any doubt that I read the whole thing? I saw those things
which seemed to confirm my initial diagnosis but did not want to
give them too much credence just because they agreed with me. The
other items I had _not_ fully excersied yet, so I'm going to focus
on something short and sweet to see if there's more I need to do
in the hardware area or it may confirm that I was already on the right


Bill Maltby
billm at wlmcs.com

On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Rod Roark wrote:

> Heh.  I have to say that one thing I really hate is building
> an expensive box and then seeing it sig11 on a kernel compile
> (one of my standard tests).  It's always a hassle to figure out 
> what's broken.
> However notice also that the article lists some other known 
> causes near the end, such as insufficient virtual memory.
> Cheers,
> -- Rod
>    http://www.sunsetsystems.com/
> On Wednesday 13 March 2002 15:55, Bill Maltby LFS Related wrote:
> > Hi Rod,
> >
> > In spite of my usual hard-headedness and initial answer, I went and
> > took a look at the site you mentioned.
> >
> > <snip>

Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-support' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-support mailing list