submount question

harvit harvit at
Sun Mar 24 12:17:51 PST 2002

thx a lot!
it's not the first time i'm missing something obvious :))


On Sun, 24 Mar 2002 08:11:40 +0100
Jeroen Coumans <jeroencoumans at> wrote:

> On Sunday 24 March 2002 02:51, harvit wrote:
> > So I'd like to know if the fstab entries are processed succesively or
> > not? Or maybe there's another way to define boot time mount
> > hierarchy?
> man fstab tells you what you want to know: it's in the first paragraph. 
> For your convenience:
> "The order of records in fstab is important because fsck(8), mount(8), 
> and umount(8) sequentially iterate through fstab doing their thing."
> I don't want to be rude, but could you have a look at 
> Thanks, HTH
> -- 
> Groeten/Greetings, 
> Jeroen Coumans
> -- 
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at
and put 'unsubscribe lfs-support' in the subject header of the message

More information about the lfs-support mailing list