LFS doesn't need to deny it's own self
jarausch at igpm.rwth-aachen.de
Mon Aug 2 00:57:26 PDT 2004
> Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>> uname -a
>> on my LFS system, I get
>> ...... GenuineIntel unknown GNU/Linux
>> Wouldn't it be much nice if it showed LFS 5.1 here?
> this is the hardware-platform field of the output.
> the same as uname -i
>> Does anybody know where to patch this and to apply such a patch
>> per default?
> there is a new patch coreutils-5.2.1-uname-2.patch
Thanks for the pointer, but this uname still doesn't display the
'distribution' (LFS in my case)
I believe I have seen the name of the distribution (Redhat or Suse) anywhere.
More information about the lfs-support