util-linux 2.12a fails, headers = kernel 2.6.6
buchanan at iinet.net.au
Tue May 11 10:20:15 PDT 2004
Ken Moffat wrote:
> Which flavour of the build are you following ? (nptl hint, what
> will be LFS-6.0, what will be LFS-6.1, some version of belfs, ...) I'm
> particularly puzzled about using gcc-3.3.2 rather than 3.3.3 (although
> it isn't relevant to your problem).
I'm using LFS 5.0. Maybe I should use LFS something else... which one
deals with Linix kernel 2.6.x and all the latest packages (unless they
> A slightly longer answer is that using 2.6.6 kernel headers is not for
> the faint-hearted. Most people seem to have moved over to
> linux-libc-headers (formerly referred to as the PLD headers). You'll
> still need to patch a few things.
Thanks, I was told about the PLD headers before. Now it's starting to
More information about the lfs-support