Are the gcc build files still needed after section 5.4?
lfs-user at mcmurchy.com
Mon Jun 5 04:56:13 PDT 2006
m at de-minimis.co.uk wrote these words on 06/05/06 04:00 CST:
> On the other hand, I can't help feeling that whilst the lfs FAQ may be
> great, that information belongs in the ln faq == ln man page. It's
> certainly not clear from there, if mentioned at all.
What man page are you looking at? Here's what I have:
ln [OPTION]... [-T] TARGET LINK_NAME (1st form)
In the 1st form, create a link to TARGET with the name LINK_NAME.
What in that snippet from the man page is difficult to understand?
cc -> gcc
Why would you interpret that link to mean the current directory?
Especially when the next sentence (2nd form) specifically mentions
the current directory.
rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.27] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3]
[GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 18.104.22.168 i686]
06:56:00 up 23 days, 22:56, 1 user, load average: 0.30, 0.10, 0.02
More information about the lfs-support