LFS Version SVN-20060501 - GCC-4.0.3 - compilation fails
Mag. Leonhard Landrock
1977-Hamlet at gmx.at
Thu May 18 14:23:38 PDT 2006
Am Donnerstag, 18. Mai 2006 22:39 schrieb Dan Nicholson:
> On 5/18/06, Mag. Leonhard Landrock <1977-Hamlet at gmx.at> wrote:
> > root:/# strings /sources/gcc-build/gcc/cppdefault.o
> > /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.0.3/include
> > /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.0.3/../../../../include/c++/4.0.3
> > /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.0.3/../../../../include/c++/4.0.3/i686-p
> > /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.0.3/../../../../include/c++/4.0.3/backwa
> >rd /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.0.3/include
> > /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.0.3/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/includ
> >e /usr/local/include
> > BINUTILS
> This is definitely the problem. /usr/include should be after
> BINUTILS. I don't know why it isn't. Everything else looks normal.
Hey, great that you found out the problem. From now on there is a real chance
to get the whole stuff corrected. :-)
> I'm stumped. I've looked over the source a few times, and I can't
> figure out how this would happen. If it thought you were building a
> cross compiler, then /usr/local/include shouldn't be in there, either.
> At this point, I would double check that all the simple stuff is
> correct like the essential symlinks.
Sorry to ask, but what are the important symlinks?
I did some kind of logging for _all_ steps within the LFS building. I just
wrote every single command to a text file.
Well, almost every single command. When I continued my work the following day
I didn't log the following three commands for example:
mount -v /dev/sdb3 $LFS
su - lfs
Might it be of any use to post this log?
> What kind of host are you building on?
I'm using Debian GNU/Linux testing.
Linux veneto 2.6.15-1-686 #2 Mon Mar 6 15:27:08 UTC 2006 i686 GNU/Linux
Side note: The stable version of Debian GNU/Linux is "to old" for an funny
More information about the lfs-support